Growing an engineering team without growing the queue
The Ipedis product team grew from 5 to 25 people. A look at the responsibilities, hiring, onboarding and dependencies that needed attention during that growth.
Intervention report
Roles, seniority, ownership, hiring, onboarding: I look at how the team actually works.
Clarify roles, seniority and ownership.
Chapter 1 · Findings
The lead developer carries too many decisions alone.
Responsibilities between product, tech and operations are unclear.
Hiring is moving, but onboarding stays slow.
Senior developers spend their time fixing problems and have little time to share knowledge.
Chapter 2 · Warning signs
Every question goes back to the same two people.
New hires take too long to become productive.
Tension comes more from ownership than from code.
Leadership does not know which profile to hire next.
Chapter 3 · Intervention
Observe how the team works
I look at how decisions are made, where work gets stuck and which responsibilities remain unclear.
Clarify ownership
I propose a simple split of roles, expectations and autonomy levels.
Structure progression paths
I introduce practices that make the team more autonomous after I leave.
Chapter 4 · Case files
Chapter 5 · Inspection

How responsibilities and decisions are distributed.
The actual seniority level compared with today’s stakes.
Rituals, reviews, handovers and collaboration habits.
Hiring, onboarding and skill development needs.
Chapter 6 · Answers
Do you act as an interim manager?
I can provide part-time technical leadership, with a clear goal: clarity and autonomy.
Is this useful for a small team?
Yes, especially when a few people already carry too many critical topics.
How do you organize a tech team that is growing?
By evolving the organization at the same time as the architecture. At PubliSpeak, the team grew from 5 to 25 people: hiring, structured onboarding, shared responsibilities and continuous upskilling.
How can you tell whether the organization is holding the development team back?
A few markers are easy to measure: how long a new developer takes to ship a first meaningful contribution, PR review time, how many departures would put the project at risk, and whether someone can ship without waiting for a key person. The team health radar covers them in 12 questions.
Next
A tool to prepare the conversation, a diagnosis to understand the context, and support to take action.
The Ipedis product team grew from 5 to 25 people. A look at the responsibilities, hiring, onboarding and dependencies that needed attention during that growth.
A lead developer organises the team’s work. A CTO works with leadership on direction, budget and hiring. My transition at Ipedis and the authority needed to take on the role.
Reviews, approvals, release slots and concentrated knowledge: examining a team’s waiting time, the effects of hiring and the DORA metrics.
A one-hour automation waits four weeks without anyone saying no. The wait can discourage further proposals, beyond the hours spent on the report.
Three hours to fix and test, six days to be allowed to release. The ticket is done, support is still refunding. In this fictional case, the wait adds ten hours of support work.