01
The roadmap slips but nobody agrees on the cause
I separate tech debt, product focus, team dependencies and implicit leadership tradeoffs.
5 days to understand what is really blocking tech and organization.
A cross-functional read on architecture, delivery, team dynamics and product decisions. Not a generic audit: a clear basis for tradeoffs.
5 days · €3,000 Action plan delivered within 7 days.
Executive decisionArchitecture · team · deliveryConcrete action plan
When the situation is too unclear to make confident decisions.
The diagnosis makes weak signals explicit before you hire, rebuild, accelerate or commit to a longer engagement.
02
The lead developer or internal CTO is carrying too much
We clarify what belongs to leadership, organization, documentation or actual team capacity.
03
You are preparing a structural decision
CTO hiring, fundraising, acquisition, major client, certification, rebuild or architecture change.
The technology, but also the system producing decisions.
01
Architecture & tech debt
Areas slowing the roadmap, increasing risk or concentrating too much knowledge.
02
Delivery & quality
How work moves from idea to production: CI/CD, tests, incidents, releases and ownership.
03
Team & governance
Roles, responsibilities, rituals, decisions and communication between leadership, product and engineering.
A short action plan leadership can read and the team can use.
01
Risk map
What can break, slow down, cost money or block the next business step.
02
30 / 60 / 90-day priorities
What to start now, what to prepare, and what not to do yet.
03
Recommended engagement format
Scoped mission, fractional CTO, team coaching, hiring or internal execution plan.
5-day format
01
1. Framing
A call to understand context, decisions to make and key people involved.
02
2. Field reading
Focused interviews, flows, architecture, backlog, incidents, available data and team rituals.
03
3. Readout
Leadership summary + prioritized action plan, with risks and tradeoffs made explicit.
FAQ
Is this a classic technical audit?
No. I look at code and architecture when useful, but the goal is to clarify business, product and organization decisions linked to technology.
Do you need access to the whole codebase?
Not necessarily. We decide the access level together. Often interviews, diagrams, backlog, incidents and a few key areas are enough for a reliable first read.
What happens afterwards?
You can execute internally, start a scoped mission, or continue with fractional CTO support. The diagnosis does not lock you in.
Need clarity before investing more?
We start from your real situation and check whether the diagnosis is the right first step.